International Rights Advocates filed a complaint under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA), asserting that Tesla presents an image of ethical, sustainable sourcing while relying on suppliers implicated in forced labor, violent abuses, mass displacement, and severe pollution. The case seeks to stop deceptive marketing and to ensure consumers are told the truth about the cost of “clean” technology.

About the case:

• Tesla’s critical minerals (including cobalt and coltan) are refined and/or mined by suppliers tied to forced and hazardous labor, violent security practices, and toxic contamination in the DRC.

• Public claims of “zero tolerance for forced labor,” “ethical sourcing,” and “sustainability” are contradicted by supplier records and on-the-ground impacts.

• Under the D.C. CPPA, Tesla’s representations constitute deceptive and unfair practices that mislead D.C. consumers.

Why it matters: Consumers choose products and brands based on ethics and climate impact. Deception undermines consumer rights, masks harm to communities, and distorts the “clean energy” market.

Legal Basis of the Complaint:

International Rights Advocates filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia under the D.C. Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA), D.C. Code §§ 28-3901 et seq.

The complaint alleges that Tesla, Inc.:

• Engaged in deceptive trade practices by falsely representing its supply chain as “sustainable,” “ethical,” and “free of forced labor.”

• Failed to disclose material facts regarding the sourcing of cobalt and coltan from suppliers in the Democratic Republic of Congo known for forced labor, hazardous conditions, violent abuses, and environmental destruction.

• Violated provisions of the CPPA that prohibit misrepresentations, omissions, and unconscionable practices in connection with the sale of goods to D.C. consumers.

IRAdvocates seeks injunctive relief, corrective disclosures, and such further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.